The Importance of Face-to-Face Clinical Evaluations
According to DME MAC A, the Medicare Administrative Contractor for Durable Medical Equipment, more than two-thirds of all claims denied in their latest audit were denied because of issues with face-to-face clinical evaluation documentation.
DME MAC A reviewed claims processed between November 2011 and January 2012 for CPAP devices. Of claims that were denied, almost half (46.5%) were missing the required clinical documentation and medical records to support the medical necessity of the device.
"These claims had no Face to Face clinical evaluations from the beneficiaries' medical records. Included in these were no Face to Face evaluations conducted by the treating physicians where the beneficiaries were seeking PAP replacement following the 5 year RUL or when requiring coverage of a replacement PAP upon entering FFS Medicare."
About 20% of the claims that were denied had insufficient clinical documentation to support the medical necessity of the device, such as:
Finally, just over 6% of denied claims were missing the signature and/or date on the face-to-face evaluation and a handful had illegible documents.
Source: Results of Widespread Prepayment Review of Claims for HCPCS E0601, (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Devices). NHIC, Corp. Retrieved August 20, 2012 from http://www.medicarenhic.com/dme/medical_review/mr_bulletins/mr_bulletin_pca/042012_cpap.pdf
DME MAC A reviewed claims processed between November 2011 and January 2012 for CPAP devices. Of claims that were denied, almost half (46.5%) were missing the required clinical documentation and medical records to support the medical necessity of the device.
"These claims had no Face to Face clinical evaluations from the beneficiaries' medical records. Included in these were no Face to Face evaluations conducted by the treating physicians where the beneficiaries were seeking PAP replacement following the 5 year RUL or when requiring coverage of a replacement PAP upon entering FFS Medicare."
About 20% of the claims that were denied had insufficient clinical documentation to support the medical necessity of the device, such as:
- No detailed narrative describing the presenting symptoms of sleep disordered breathing, daytime sleepiness/fatigue, observed apneas, choking/gasping during sleep; duration of symptoms; or Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores
- The face-to-face clinical re-evaluation failed to demonstrate an improvement in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) symptoms and that the patient continued to benefit from PAP therapy
- Insufficient clinical documentation for face-to-face evaluations where the patient is seeking PAP replacement or when requesting coverage of a replacement PAP upon entering FFS Medicare
Finally, just over 6% of denied claims were missing the signature and/or date on the face-to-face evaluation and a handful had illegible documents.
Source: Results of Widespread Prepayment Review of Claims for HCPCS E0601, (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Devices). NHIC, Corp. Retrieved August 20, 2012 from http://www.medicarenhic.com/dme/medical_review/mr_bulletins/mr_bulletin_pca/042012_cpap.pdf
Comments
Display comments as Linear | Threaded